In French snap elections, parties are overlooking the climate change nightmare

If you look at the big picture, despair is only allowed for a short moment. Then we must go back to work and continue the fight because hope is the strongest bond shared by all humanity, Adeline Rochet writes.

As a French citizen, the outcome of the first round of the French snap elections is a heartbreaker. As a climate campaigner, it is an absolute nightmare.

Whatever the final result and the final composition of the Parliament, climate and the environment have been blatantly absent from the campaign.

How could it be otherwise when the decision to revoke the current set of MPs was so sudden and with the far right closest to power than at any time since World War II?

Yet, climate change didn’t hit pause over the weekend: the parallel pictures of a “brown” far-right wave taking over the French electoral map, while torrents of mud were taking over alpine towns, in Northern Italy, in Austria, in Switzerland, were properly bloodcurdling.

And each and every day, the planet warms a fraction more, and we lose a bit more natural capital and ecosystems because of uncontrolled human activities. The environmental crisis doesn’t hold its breath as it waits for polling stations to close.

A stalemate could cause a stall

There are still several scenarios on the table for France, but none really are comforting: a far-right government is a serious threat to democracy, civil peace, and equality and will likely only damage the social fabric — who knows where the downward spiral would end?

But even a stalemate between three political parties will prevent meaningful political action and prevent fixing the issues that led France there, the causes of French citizens suffering and worries.

It would, at best, delay the looming crisis of the regime by a few months. French politics is not designed for compromise and coalition; the system as it is now feeds on clear-cut clashes, and chances of addressing the faults of the current constitution are growing thinner every day.

None of the potential scenarios will prioritize the transition to a climate neutral, nature positive economy, despite the huge benefits it could bring — provided the state plans for it, creates the condition to deliver on ambitions, puts serious money on the table while building confidence for private investors to follow in that direction.

It is a problem for France, of course: the country may not be such a big direct greenhouse gas emitter, but it’s nonetheless the seventh economic power globally, with huge indirect emissions.

In fact, the French population on average consumes twice the available resources of the country each year.

French slump to escalate?

Putting a stop on current sustainable investments plans in France would see dozens of thousands of jobs destroyed, losing assets and infrastructures that will be needed for tomorrow’s markets, meaning durable recession, destroying the social fabric a little further.

It would send a terrible message externally: if France gives up on trying to engage in the sustainable transition, then why would its allies even try? The current sense of collective motivation in the “race to clean” would suffer from France giving up.

For Europe, a French slump could escalate to the supra-national level, creating the conditions for a blocking minority in the European Council against any green and/or social policy initiative, threatening the progress that we’ve seen over the past decade.