2024-11-29 22:11:24
We still have an opportunity to reduce CO2 emissions from the atmosphere. This is not as difficult as it sounds. Here are some reflections, questions and answers that will help us solve the problem, covering only 70% of global emissions we can achieve important global results:
Within this group we can mention the generation of energy that contributes around 25% of the world's CO2 emissions. The Agriculture and Forestry sector with around 24%. The industrial sector with around 21% of emissions. Transport with 14% and the residential sector with 6%. In addition, there are other very atomized issuers that can also make their individual contributions, since they account for 10% of the remaining emissions overall.
Around 100 million tons of CO2 would stop being emitted into the atmosphere.
We would be talking about reducing emissions comparable to the total emissions of South America, with around 1,200 million tons of CO2 that would stop being emitted into the atmosphere.
We would be talking about reducing emissions comparable to the emissions of Russia and Germany together, with a total of 2.47 billion tons of CO2 that would stop being emitted into the atmosphere. 2 days a month is recommended to achieve an acceptable emission reduction result.
And so on. This obviously comes at a cost to the world. However, this has been the way to make profitable industries to the detriment of the environment. This cannot be free.
Through a calendar of arrests known to all (companies, workers, government organizations, environmental inspectors, social networks, etc.) and that in case of noncompliance, reporting channels can be used and sanctions for non-compliance can be app
In order for it to function efficiently, all countries should apply this measure and thus subsidize those that are not meeting their goals according to this agreement. This is a measure applicable to all countries, simple to understand and easy to apply. This is something that affects us all.
If they can demonstrate reduction of CO2 emissions, through changes in their processes, as well as new projects with approved financing and that address the focus of the emissions problem, they can reduce the annual scheduled of arrests by up to 50%.
These companies could reduce the detention schedule by 50%. It is advised that the calendar be 2 detentions per month, therefore, those companies that work through carbon credits, could reduce to one detention per month.
Companies can join a calendar of arrests independent of government actions. This must be a true crusade so that everyone can do their part in the arrests. Only in the case of electricity rate hikes caused by arrests in the case of the energy industry and that could affect users, governments could intervene by subsidizing the rise in electricity rates since it could affect a larger population.
This article is written by Marcelo Gilberto Bravo Peñaloza, Forestal Engineer.
Most Viewed
Elephants, Giant Harmless Animals
2024-11-29 22:11:23
Commercial whaling and climate change are inhibiting evolutionary change in Arctic whales
2024-11-29 22:11:24
World Environment Day: 5th June
2024-11-29 22:11:24
Talking About Earth Day at Havre de Grace Maritime Museum
2024-11-29 22:11:24
Lithium: Global Projects and Policies of Economic Powers
2024-11-29 22:11:24
Why we need a UN Treaty on plastic pollution The Ellen MacArthur Foundation is a UK charity working on business, learning, insights & analysis, and communications to accelerate the transition towards the circular economy.
Air Pollution for Kids Air is all around us and we need it to survive.
Why We Need to Stop Plastic Pollution? Our oceans are being filled and killed by throwaway plastics.
Climate Change, Ecological Crisis and Sustainability We are all agents for change in climate action.
Climate Racism Climate Racism: Social Inequalities in the Age of Climate Change
Comment
Reply